Gevonden door Hans Erren: interview met klimaatwetenschapper Judith Curry
Bron: http://www.collide-a-scape.com/2010/04/23/an-inconvenient-provocateur/
Fragment:
“With respect to the torquing of the science by the IPCC, there are many small examples, but I describe here three broad issues:
- a senior leader at one of the big climate modeling institutions told me that climate modelers seem to be spending 80% of their time on the IPCC production runs, and 20% of their time developing better climate models.
- there is a huge rush of journal article submissions just before the IPCC deadlines; clearly many scientists are trying to get their latest research included in the IPCC. There is the perception out there that best way to have a paper included in the IPCC is to support the established IPCC narrative.
- scientists involved in the IPCC are attempting to influence the research process (e.g. peer review in journals, not making key data and metadata available) to support the IPCC narrative and using the IPCC platform to editorialize against and discredit critics (examples of these abound in the CRU emails).”
Hello there, I discovered your web site via Google whilst searching for
a related topic, your website got here up, it looks good.
I’ve bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.[X-N-E-W-L-I-N-S-P-I-N-X]Hello there, simply was aware of your blog through Google, and located that it
is really informative. I am gonna be careful for brussels.
I will appreciate for those who continue this in future. A lot
of folks can be benefited from your writing. Cheers!
Feel free to visit my page – Phoenix search engine optimization